Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

non-pairwise effect sizes #30

Open
melissaszy opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

non-pairwise effect sizes #30

melissaszy opened this issue Dec 1, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@melissaszy
Copy link

Hello,

I trying to use evident and am wondering if there is a way to filter the data before calculating non-pairwise effect sizes.

I want to calculate the non-pairwise effect size of one category (species). I have five variables currently in that category (water, dog, cat, rabbit, mouse). Is it possible to calculate non-pairwise effect size of only dog, cat, rabbit, mouse ie by first filtering out the water samples?

Alternatively, is it possible to derive non-pairwise effect sizes for the four species based on pairwise effect sizes? For instance, I calculate pairwise effect sizes based on all five variables (water, dog, cat, rabbit, mouse) then I ignore the pairwise effect sizes that involves water samples. Using the remaining effect sizes (related to dog, cat, rabbit, mouse), can I calculate a non-pairwise effect size?

Thank you for your time.

@antgonza
Copy link
Contributor

antgonza commented Dec 4, 2023

Hi @melissaszy, if I understand correctly your question: yes, you can simply ignore the pairwise calculation against water. However, I think it will be best if you remove those samples from your feature table or distance matrix and then calculate the effect size of the rest of the samples. Hope this helps.

@melissaszy
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your help!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants