Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metatranscriptome without paired metagenome #22

Open
gaofeng-ni opened this issue Feb 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Metatranscriptome without paired metagenome #22

gaofeng-ni opened this issue Feb 25, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@gaofeng-ni
Copy link

Hi,

Thanks for the cool program. A few question regarding running Humann for metatranscriptomes without paired metagenome.

As a first trial, I searched against UniRef90. The resulted genefamily.tsv don't have annotation for each gene:

# Gene Family   AF1_Abundance-RPKs      AF2_Abundance-RPKs      AF3_Abundance-RPKs      BE1_Abundance-RPKs      BE2_Abundance-RPKs      BE3_Abundance-RPKs
UNMAPPED        0.6573  0.642728        0.602355        0.752705        0.694749        0.665102
UniRef90_A0A009DWL0     0       1.51238e-07     0       0       0       0
UniRef90_A0A009DWL0|unclassified        0       1.51238e-07     0       0       0       0
UniRef90_A0A009EC87     0       4.07372e-06     2.97242e-06     0       0       0
UniRef90_A0A009EC87|unclassified        0       4.07372e-06     2.97242e-06     0       0       0
UniRef90_A0A009ECP6     0       0       2.60899e-06     0       0       0
UniRef90_A0A009ECP6|unclassified        0       0       2.60899e-06     0       0       0
UniRef90_A0A009EGZ3     2.77973e-06     1.90415e-06     0       0       0       0
UniRef90_A0A009EGZ3|unclassified        2.77973e-06     1.90415e-06     0       0       0       0
  1. Since in the documentation includes functional annotation for each gene family, I'm wondering if I missed anything or I need to run annotation separately.
  2. I'm working with poorly characterized microbial communities, since my mapping rate is low, it's good to try UniRef50?
  3. I have 2 conditions (in triplicates), and I wish to carry out differential expression analysis downstream, what would be the recommended input? Will a normalized and joint table with humann_renorm_table --units cpm or joint tables without normalization and follow with something like DESeq2?

Many thanks!

My codes are:

humann \
--input ${READ_DIR}/$SAMPLE.fastq.gz \
--output $OUTPUT_DIR \
--threads 24 \
--search-mode uniref90 \
--nucleotide-identity-threshold 50 \
--translated-identity-threshold 30 \
--translated-query-coverage-threshold 50 \
--nucleotide-query-coverage-threshold 70 \
--metaphlan-options "--read_min_len 29"

conda deactivate
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant