Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License not recommended for software? #40

Closed
gavingmiller opened this issue Dec 20, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

License not recommended for software? #40

gavingmiller opened this issue Dec 20, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@gavingmiller
Copy link

The description for CC Attribution 4.0 Int on GitHub reads as:

Permits almost any use subject to providing credit and license notice. Frequently used for media assets and educational materials. The most common license for Open Access scientific publications. Not recommended for software.

Not recommended for software is a bit concerning considering this is attached to a piece of software. Is there a better license that this project can be released under? If not, can you speak to why this license was selected and the implications of using it in a project?

Thanks!

@ai
Copy link
Member

ai commented Dec 20, 2019

caniuse-db uses this license, since they contain JSON data only.

Since we are just repack of caniuse-db we are using the same license.

Technically, caniuse-lite is 90% of JSON and only 10% of unpacking scripts.

I think it is not critical to uses non-software license in this case. Software licenses are good since they are clearify complicated moments. But it doesn't mean that you can use non-software licenses. It means only that there is more gray zones.

@ai
Copy link
Member

ai commented Dec 20, 2019

This problem will be fixed during our Loshadka project.

Right now we are collecting money for this project on Open Collective. If licensing is a problem for your company (it is great that you are doing license review) feel free to donate to fix the problem faster)

@mifi
Copy link

mifi commented Jan 18, 2020

I'm not sure if i understand correctly, but I think this means that anyone using create-react-app (which uses caniuse-lite) or any other framework that uses browserlist, and who distributes this as part of their production bundle on a web server, will have to include credits to the creators of the caniuse-lite package somewhere on the produced website?

https://tldrlegal.com/license/creative-commons-attribution-4.0-international-(cc-by-4)

@ai
Copy link
Member

ai commented Jan 18, 2020

@mifi unfortunately, this is Can I Use database license. We can’t change the license in our repack. Ask them to change the license.

@mifi
Copy link

mifi commented Jan 18, 2020

I see there has been a discussion about this already. Fyrd/caniuse#4062
I will take the discussion at create-react-app which is my dependent on caniuse-lite.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants