You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am curious how you created the list of documents (the corpus). The original hotpot_qa does not come with that list of documents. Instead for each query it comes with a list of only 10 documents - 2 documents with the content for the gold answer and 8 distractor documents. My current assumption is the following. you took the distractor dataset and extracted the documents for all queries to build the corpus. The 2 gold documents in the original hotpotqa were then marked as the relevant documents for a specific query.
Please let me know how it works, since this confuses me quite a lot. Thank you very much!
If my assumption is correct you could also have a look at the multi-hop-rag dataset which was specifically created in that format already (corpus is seperated from the query and answer). The documents are also longer, which I think is a more realistic use case for a retrieval system, specially a RAG system.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am curious how you created the list of documents (the corpus). The original hotpot_qa does not come with that list of documents. Instead for each query it comes with a list of only 10 documents - 2 documents with the content for the gold answer and 8 distractor documents. My current assumption is the following. you took the distractor dataset and extracted the documents for all queries to build the corpus. The 2 gold documents in the original hotpotqa were then marked as the relevant documents for a specific query.
Please let me know how it works, since this confuses me quite a lot. Thank you very much!
If my assumption is correct you could also have a look at the multi-hop-rag dataset which was specifically created in that format already (corpus is seperated from the query and answer). The documents are also longer, which I think is a more realistic use case for a retrieval system, specially a RAG system.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: