Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v3.0.1 module documentation missing on hexdocs.pm #114

Closed
superhawk610 opened this issue Oct 26, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

v3.0.1 module documentation missing on hexdocs.pm #114

superhawk610 opened this issue Oct 26, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@superhawk610
Copy link

The module documentation, typically found under API Reference on hexdocs.pm appears to be missing on the latest version. It is present on v3.0.0 and all earlier versions, so I'm not sure if this is an issue with :ex_doc or what.

For example, I'd expect to find docs for the CSV module at https://hexdocs.pm/csv/3.0.1/CSV.html, but that page is missing. The corresponding page for v3.0.0 is present at https://hexdocs.pm/csv/3.0.0/CSV.html.

@beatrichartz
Copy link
Owner

Thanks! It's curious, the API reference seems to be missing, and publishing it again does not make a difference. There's also no doc changes from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1 so I'll have to check with people running hexdocs.

@jamesvl
Copy link
Contributor

jamesvl commented Oct 31, 2022

Minor, but also related to the documentation: the Upgrading from 2.x section of the docs names the :trim_fields option, but it should in fact be :strip_fields

(The README file and 2.5.x docs both show it as :strip_fields)

Update: nevermind; I see the README should be what hexdocs is showing, but is not.

@beatrichartz
Copy link
Owner

Ok so I figured out that ex_doc isn't working with elixir 1.10.x anymore which I was using to build the docs locally to publish them. Fixed that and now both 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 have module documentation again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants