Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix broken --fail-fast #5633

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 8, 2018
Merged

Fix broken --fail-fast #5633

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 8, 2018

Conversation

mmyoji
Copy link
Contributor

@mmyoji mmyoji commented Mar 6, 2018

rubocop --fail-fast was broken at 43a157f

I fixed this and add minimum test for it.

@bbatsov
Copy link
Collaborator

bbatsov commented Mar 8, 2018

Nice catch! Can you please add a changelog entry as well?

@mmyoji
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmyoji commented Mar 8, 2018

@bbatsov thank you for your review! I added a changelog in the last commit 😄

@koic
Copy link
Member

koic commented Mar 8, 2018

Thanks for the first time contribution.

It seems that CI has failure.
https://travis-ci.org/bbatsov/rubocop/jobs/350648219#L4210

That will be resolved by adding your account at the end of CHANGELOG.md.
Refer 8ec6cf6#diff-4ac32a78649ca5bdd8e0ba38b7006a1eR3232

When you are finished, please squash multiple commits in PR into 1 commit.

Add lacked `--fail-fast` test at minimum as well
@mmyoji
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmyoji commented Mar 8, 2018

@koic I fixed the CHANGELOG.md and rebased the commits into a single one 👍 Thank you for your help 🙌

@bbatsov bbatsov merged commit d4032d0 into rubocop:master Mar 8, 2018
@bbatsov
Copy link
Collaborator

bbatsov commented Mar 8, 2018

👍

@mmyoji mmyoji deleted the fix-broken-fail-fast branch March 9, 2018 03:19
@issei-m
Copy link

issei-m commented Mar 9, 2018

👍

@iliabylich
Copy link
Contributor

Are there any plans to release it?

This was referenced Mar 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants