feat(typescript): add direct_sources field to JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo

Some consumers may only be interested in the javascript sources that are produced directly by the dep and not in the sources produced by transitive deps. This change allows those consumers to select only those sources.

BREAKING CHANGES:
Helper function `transitive_js_ecma_script_module_info` in `//:providers.bzl` renamed to `js_ecma_script_module_info`. It now returns a JSEcmaScriptModule info with both `sources` and `direct_sources` fields populated.

examples/angular/patches/@angular+bazel+9.0.0-next.8.patch

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ index 9b88fbb..68217d0 100755
      "ts_providers_dict_to_struct",
      "tsc_wrapped_tsconfig",
  )
-+load("@build_bazel_rules_nodejs//:providers.bzl", "transitive_js_ecma_script_module_info")
++load("@build_bazel_rules_nodejs//:providers.bzl", "js_ecma_script_module_info")
 
  _FLAT_DTS_FILE_SUFFIX = ".bundle.d.ts"
  _R3_SYMBOLS_DTS_FILE = "src/r3_symbols.d.ts"
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ index 9b88fbb..68217d0 100755
 +
 +    # Add in new JS providers
 +    ts_providers["providers"].extend([
-+        transitive_js_ecma_script_module_info(
++        js_ecma_script_module_info(
 +            sources = ts_providers["typescript"]["es6_sources"],
 +            deps = ctx.attr.deps,
 +        ),

packages/typescript/src/internal/build_defs.bzl

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 
 "TypeScript compilation"
 
-load("@build_bazel_rules_nodejs//:providers.bzl", "transitive_js_ecma_script_module_info")
+load("@build_bazel_rules_nodejs//:providers.bzl", "js_ecma_script_module_info")
 load("@build_bazel_rules_nodejs//internal/common:node_module_info.bzl", "NodeModuleSources", "collect_node_modules_aspect")
 
 # pylint: disable=unused-argument
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ def _ts_library_impl(ctx):
     # See design doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ggkY5RqUkVL4aQLYm7esRW978LgX3GUCnQirrk5E1C0/edit#
     # and issue https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_nodejs/issues/57 for more details.
     ts_providers["providers"].extend([
-        transitive_js_ecma_script_module_info(
+        js_ecma_script_module_info(
             sources = ts_providers["typescript"]["es6_sources"],
             deps = ctx.attr.deps,
         ),

providers.bzl

@@ -31,36 +31,22 @@ TODO: should we require that?
 
 Historical note: this was the typescript.es6_sources output""",
     fields = {
+        "direct_sources": "depset of direct JavaScript files and sourcemaps",
         "sources": "depset of direct and transitive JavaScript files and sourcemaps",
     },
 )
 
-def transitive_js_ecma_script_module_info(sources, deps = []):
+def js_ecma_script_module_info(sources, deps = []):
     """Constructs a JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo including all transitive sources from JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo providers in a list of deps.
 
 Returns a single JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo.
 """
-    return combine_js_ecma_script_module_info([JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo(sources = sources)] + collect_js_ecma_script_module_infos(deps))
-
-def combine_js_ecma_script_module_info(modules):
-    """Combines all JavaScript sources and sourcemaps from a list of JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo providers.
+    transitive_depsets = [sources]
+    for dep in deps:
+        if JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo in dep:
+            transitive_depsets.append(dep[JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo].sources)
 
-Returns a single JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo.
-"""
-    sources_depsets = []
-    for module in modules:
-        sources_depsets.extend([module.sources])
     return JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo(
-        sources = depset(transitive = sources_depsets),
+        direct_sources = sources,
+        sources = depset(transitive = transitive_depsets),
     )
-
-def collect_js_ecma_script_module_infos(deps):
-    """Collects all JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo providers from a list of deps.
-
-Returns a list of JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo providers.
-"""
-    modules = []
-    for dep in deps:
-        if JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo in dep:
-            modules.extend([dep[JSEcmaScriptModuleInfo]])
-    return modules