Let rules_jsonnet use its own provider #172
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
EdSchouten
force-pushed
the
KB/NOJIRA/introduce-provider-jsonnet
branch
from
3de6d51 to
b64b819
Compare
Right now it uses struct() to declare information that's yielded, but this makes it annoying to use, especially when using it in combination with other rules that do use providers.
EdSchouten
force-pushed
the
KB/NOJIRA/introduce-provider-jsonnet
branch
from
b64b819 to
b667b00
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Right now it uses struct() to declare information that's yielded, but this makes it annoying to use, especially when using it in combination with other rules that do use providers.