Add support for ltex-ls-plus

[phrmendes]

There is a better mantained fork of ltex-ls: https://github.com/ltex-plus/ltex-ls-plus

[barreiroleo]

Hmm, sounds good. I won't promise to implement any time soon though.

Couple of links to my future me

• Not in mason yet, check releases: github.com/ltex-plus/lsp-cli-plus/releases
• Already covered by nvim-lspconfig: github.com/neovim/nvim-lspconfig/blob/master/doc/configs.md#ltex_plus

[austinbutler]

The first change would probably be checking for ltex_plus in addition to ltex here:

ltex_extra.nvim/lua/ltex_extra/commands-lsp.lua

Line 55 in 24acd04

name = "ltex",

In fact, in my testing that might be the only change required?

[cxwx]

The first change would probably be checking for ltex_plus in addition to ltex here:

ltex_extra.nvim/lua/ltex_extra/commands-lsp.lua

Line 55 in 24acd04

name = "ltex",

In fact, in my testing that might be the only change required?

It seems so

[barreiroleo]

If ltex_plus keep the same interface for lsp commands, then yes, is the only change required.
Ty for digging in