Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New Pattern: appsync-dynamodb #99

Open
1 of 2 tasks
knihit opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

New Pattern: appsync-dynamodb #99

knihit opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
Backlog We don't have the bandwidth to support this task right now, but will consider it in the future. feature-request A feature should be added or improved

Comments

@knihit
Copy link
Member

knihit commented Nov 3, 2020

Similar to as we have API gateway -> DynamoDB or Api gateway -> lambda -> DynamoDB, we should also have a pattern that covers GraphQL resolvers to DynamoDB (AppSync to DynamoDB).

Use Case

Most of the constructs for APIs that we have today are targeted towards REST based services but none towards GraphQL based APIs. AppSync and GraphQL being the next generation of API platform to support, construct with AppSync with DynamoDB will help customers to build their applications faster.

Proposed Solution

TBD, but at a high level

  1. construct props to define the resolvers
  2. define and configure DynamoDB
  3. configure permissions required for AppSync authentication model
  4. role permissions to allow AppSync to connect with DynamoDB

Other

  • 👋 I may be able to implement this feature request
  • ⚠️ This feature might incur a breaking change

This is a 🚀 Feature Request
@knihit knihit added feature-request A feature should be added or improved needs-triage The issue or PR still needs to be triaged labels Nov 3, 2020
@knihit knihit changed the title New feature: appsync-dynamodb New Pattern: appsync-dynamodb Nov 3, 2020
@hnishar hnishar removed the needs-triage The issue or PR still needs to be triaged label Dec 4, 2020
@biffgaut
Copy link
Contributor

Not on the near term roadmap, moving to our backlog

@biffgaut biffgaut added the Backlog We don't have the bandwidth to support this task right now, but will consider it in the future. label Mar 29, 2021
@jaresuth
Copy link

jaresuth commented Sep 7, 2021

@biffgaut - Do you mind if I look at tackling this Feature Request?

@jeffshep jeffshep mentioned this issue Sep 20, 2022
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Backlog We don't have the bandwidth to support this task right now, but will consider it in the future. feature-request A feature should be added or improved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@hnishar @knihit @biffgaut @jaresuth