Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(appsync): unexpected resolver replacement #23322

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 14, 2022
Merged

Conversation

MrArnoldPalmer
Copy link
Contributor

@MrArnoldPalmer MrArnoldPalmer commented Dec 13, 2022

fix(appsync): unstable IDs on resolvers and functions

Fixes an issue that would cause unexpected resource replacement for
appsync resolvers and functions because of construct nesting and ID
generation.

Changes createResolver and createFunction methods on GraphQlApi
and DataSource constructs to require explicitly passing an ID.
Additionally changes the scope of the constructs created in
createResolver and createFunction on the DataSource construct to
be this.api instead of this. This allows users to change the data
sources of resolvers and functions while keeping the IDs stable and
avoiding resource replacement.

This helps to avoid the only one resolver per field error that occurs
when deleting a resolver on a field, and adding a new one within the
same deployment.

BREAKING CHANGE: DataSource.createResolver,
DataSource.createFunction, and GraphQlApi.createResolver now require
2 arguments instead of 1.

Fixes: #13269


All Submissions:

Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies:

  • This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described here

New Features

  • Have you added the new feature to an integration test?
    • Did you use yarn integ to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. yarn integ without --dry-run)?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@MrArnoldPalmer MrArnoldPalmer requested a review from a team December 13, 2022 00:14
@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Dec 13, 2022

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team December 13, 2022 00:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Dec 13, 2022
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Dec 13, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

Fixes an issue that would cause unexpected resource replacement for
appsync resolvers and functions because of construct nesting and ID
generation.

Changes `createResolver` and `createFunction` methods on `GraphQlApi`
and `DataSource` constructs to require explicitly passing an ID.
Additionally changes the scope of the constructs created in
`createResolver` and `createFunction` on the `DataSource` construct to
be `this.api` instead of `this`. This allows users to change the data
sources of resolvers and functions while keeping the IDs stable and
avoiding resource replacement.

This helps to avoid the `only one resolver per field` error that occurs
when deleting a resolver on a field, and adding a new one within the
same deployment.

BREAKING CHANGE: `DataSource.createResolver`,
`DataSource.createFunction`, and `GraphQlApi.createResolver` now require
2 arguments instead of 1.

Fixes: #13269
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review December 13, 2022 20:02

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dissmissing previous PRLinter review.

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 14, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 4686e93
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 6dc15d4 into main Dec 14, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the fix/resolver-replacement branch December 14, 2022 16:28
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 14, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

brennanho pushed a commit to brennanho/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2023
fix(appsync): unstable IDs on resolvers and functions

Fixes an issue that would cause unexpected resource replacement for
appsync resolvers and functions because of construct nesting and ID
generation.

Changes `createResolver` and `createFunction` methods on `GraphQlApi`
and `DataSource` constructs to require explicitly passing an ID.
Additionally changes the scope of the constructs created in
`createResolver` and `createFunction` on the `DataSource` construct to
be `this.api` instead of `this`. This allows users to change the data
sources of resolvers and functions while keeping the IDs stable and
avoiding resource replacement.

This helps to avoid the `only one resolver per field` error that occurs
when deleting a resolver on a field, and adding a new one within the
same deployment.

BREAKING CHANGE: `DataSource.createResolver`,
`DataSource.createFunction`, and `GraphQlApi.createResolver` now require
2 arguments instead of 1.

Fixes: aws#13269

----

### All Submissions:

* [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies:

* [ ] This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-construct-runtime-dependencies)

### New Features

* [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)?
	* [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)?

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
brennanho pushed a commit to brennanho/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2023
fix(appsync): unstable IDs on resolvers and functions

Fixes an issue that would cause unexpected resource replacement for
appsync resolvers and functions because of construct nesting and ID
generation.

Changes `createResolver` and `createFunction` methods on `GraphQlApi`
and `DataSource` constructs to require explicitly passing an ID.
Additionally changes the scope of the constructs created in
`createResolver` and `createFunction` on the `DataSource` construct to
be `this.api` instead of `this`. This allows users to change the data
sources of resolvers and functions while keeping the IDs stable and
avoiding resource replacement.

This helps to avoid the `only one resolver per field` error that occurs
when deleting a resolver on a field, and adding a new one within the
same deployment.

BREAKING CHANGE: `DataSource.createResolver`,
`DataSource.createFunction`, and `GraphQlApi.createResolver` now require
2 arguments instead of 1.

Fixes: aws#13269

----

### All Submissions:

* [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies:

* [ ] This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-construct-runtime-dependencies)

### New Features

* [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)?
	* [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)?

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

(aws-appsync): resolver replacement issues
3 participants