Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CDK Explorer Roadmap #21

Closed
1 of 16 tasks
eladb opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed
1 of 16 tasks

CDK Explorer Roadmap #21

eladb opened this issue Dec 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
status/proposed Newly proposed RFC status/stale The RFC did not get any significant enough progress or tracking and has become stale. tools Tools

Comments

@eladb
Copy link
Contributor

eladb commented Dec 8, 2019 •
edited by shivlaks
Loading

PR Champion
#

Description

  • Jump to code
  • Deploy
  • Diff visualization
  • Watch
  • Permissions View (Security posture summary #20)
  • Filter out system constructs (like Parameters)
  • Showing types for L2 constructs (merging with "Resource")
  • Deep linking resources to console (cross account support using CI/CD deployment roles)
  • Surface drift detection (Resource imports #24)

Progress

  • Tracking Issue Created
  • RFC PR Created
  • Core Team Member Assigned
  • Initial Approval / Final Comment Period
  • Ready For Implementation
    • implementation issue 1
  • Resolved
@eladb eladb added the tools Tools label Dec 8, 2019
@eladb eladb changed the title CDK Explorer CDK explorer Dec 9, 2019
@eladb eladb changed the title CDK explorer CDK Explorer Dec 9, 2019
@MrArnoldPalmer MrArnoldPalmer added the status/proposed Newly proposed RFC label Jan 4, 2020
@eladb eladb changed the title CDK Explorer CDK Explorer Roadmap Apr 14, 2020
@pgollucci
Copy link

Any more thoughts here?

@lestephane
Copy link

It does not mention whether Intellij will ever be supported. This would affect whether I bother paying the Intellij yearly fee, or simply jump over to VSCode.

@mrgrain mrgrain added the status/stale The RFC did not get any significant enough progress or tracking and has become stale. label Oct 13, 2023
@mrgrain mrgrain closed this as completed Oct 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status/proposed Newly proposed RFC status/stale The RFC did not get any significant enough progress or tracking and has become stale. tools Tools
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@pgollucci @mrgrain @eladb @lestephane @MrArnoldPalmer