-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Tetrate Istio Distribution #245
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zirain Thankyou so much for the PR. @mikemcd3912 @Pjv93 Lets get tetrate
validated across all EKS-A and EKS deployment models and share feedback of the runs in the PR.
Hi @zirain, It looks like we have a collision with another partner's software already using the istio-system namespace that is preventing flux from deploying the tetrate add-on. Please update the namespace to one that will be unique to this add-on so that we can begin testing. For example tetrate-istio could be a good option, but I will leave that naming up to you Thanks! |
Signed-off-by: zirain <[email protected]>
Updated |
@mikemcd3912 Can you we get this validated with new |
Looks like your deployment
|
Hi @zirain , It appears we have success at times but it doesn't seem stable just yet as we encounter an intermittent certificate issue when trying to generate the ingressgateway pod for the tester. I've attached a couple of log files for reference, however all of the failing pods are all experiencing the same issue and output nearly identical logs:
Let me know if there is anything else I can provide to assist with troubleshooting or if you'd like to set up a time to look at things together live. Thanks! |
Looks like your deployment
|
Hi, is there any way we can replicate the testing setup on our end? |
let's wait #261 first. |
@zirain #261 Works fine. We wont merge it until we have this PR's functional job working. We want both Istio mesh products to work in Tandem. @mdamt In terms of Local testing please follow the steps here for test on mac/linux. Alternatively you can use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @zirain for all of the help troubleshooting this! Everything is working as expected and both istio PR's are co-existing on the clusters with that latest edit applied to Solo. LGTM
EKSA:
- VMware (K8s 1.28, Bottlerocket 1.15): Pods deploy and reach a ready state, tester completes successfully on first attempt
- Outposts (K8s 1.27, Amazon Linux 2): Pods deploy and reach a ready state, tester completes successfully on first attempt
- Baremetal (K8s 1.27, Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS): Pods deploy and reach a ready state, tester completes successfully on first attempt
EKS:
- EKS (K8s 1.28, ARM Bottlerocket 1.19): Pods deploy and reach a ready state, tester completes successfully on first attempt
- EKS (K8s 1.28, ARM Amazon Linux 2): Pods deploy and reach a ready state, tester completes successfully on first attempt
- EKS (K8s 1.28, x86 Amazon Linux 2): Pods deploy and reach a ready state, tester completes successfully on first attempt
- EKS (K8s 1.28, x86 Bottlerocket): Pods deploy and reach a ready state, tester completes successfully on first attempt
resbumit #242