You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
Generally in a reverse zone there can't be any A/AAAA records and in a non-reverse zone there can't be any PTR records.
To improve the reliability of the system, creating records of the wrong type should be inhibited on the form and/or model level. Some other record types (e.g. MX) will also be affected by the same restrictions on PTR zones.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Generally? See RFC 1101 for corner cases: network masks may show up as A records in reverse zones if you want to make your subnetting visible, and PTR records in non-reverse zones if you track "network names" (wow!?). Though I am quite unsure if we'll find these usages nowadays in the wild. OTOH prohibiting it does not feel right (could i.e. be used for documentation in internal views).
Nevertheless, prohibiting (definitly) wrong entries is the right idea.
This issue is a bit too broad to be handled in one single change. Most of what it intends has been implemented by the record validation code in #181 and #175, and as @JuergenKammer pointed out some parts of this issue don't actually make as much sense as they seemed to.
Generally in a reverse zone there can't be any A/AAAA records and in a non-reverse zone there can't be any PTR records.
To improve the reliability of the system, creating records of the wrong type should be inhibited on the form and/or model level. Some other record types (e.g. MX) will also be affected by the same restrictions on PTR zones.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: