Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: integer type should also be implied #118

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 2, 2021
Merged

fix: integer type should also be implied #118

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 2, 2021

Conversation

jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

Description
This PR introduces the following:

  • Improving test coverage
  • fixed integer type was not implied.

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni changed the title fix: integer type should also be implied fix: integer type should also be implied Feb 27, 2021
@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni mentioned this pull request Feb 27, 2021
Merged
magicmatatjahu
magicmatatjahu approved these changes Mar 2, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni merged commit 56b735b into asyncapi:master Mar 2, 2021
@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni deleted the feature/unit_test branch March 2, 2021 13:55
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.2.4 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
released
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@jonaslagoni @asyncapi-bot @magicmatatjahu