Formatter undocumented deviation: wrapping with annotation only and comment

[JonathanPlasse]

Black formatting

class Animatable(Protocol):
    """Protocol for objects that can be animated."""

    animation_data: bpy.types.AnimData  # TODO(jonathan): Change to Optional when fake-bpy-module is updated

Ruff formatting

class Animatable(Protocol):
    """Protocol for objects that can be animated."""

    animation_data: (
        bpy.types.AnimData
    )  # TODO(jonathan): Change to Optional when fake-bpy-module is updated

Ruff 0.0.289 with line-length 100

I prefer Black formatting

[MichaReiser]

I can see how Black's formatting may seem better but Black's code exceeds the configured line width of 100, whereas Ruff's formatting stays in the limit.

Black is also a bit inconsistent here because it uses the same formatting as ruff if you change this to an assignment:

animation_data = (
    bpy.types.AnimData
)  # TODO(jonathan): Change to Optional when fake-bpy-module is updated

I propose that we stick to Ruff's layout because:

• It is more consistent with other syntax
• It stays within the configured line length

I'll leave this open for now to let other people chime in.

[MichaReiser]

Closing as duplicate of 7315