Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Region inside another region - HOTFIX needed! #2

Open
VADemon opened this issue Aug 2, 2012 · 4 comments
Open

Region inside another region - HOTFIX needed! #2

VADemon opened this issue Aug 2, 2012 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@VADemon
Copy link

VADemon commented Aug 2, 2012

There're two regions.
The first region is called "city" and the second region is "house".
City has a -10 priority, house wasn't touched.
When you try to to move a block that is inside the region "city" from the outside with a sticky piston - plugin blocks this action well.

BUT if you have access to "city" but not to the region "house" then you can easily get blocks from "house" with a sticky piston (that also works with a normal piston). The plugin doesn't detect it!

@asofold
Copy link
Owner

asofold commented Aug 3, 2012

Do both regions have owners or is one of the regions unowned?

If one of the regions has no owners or members it might be fixable by adding a dummy owner/group to the region, which should prevent further cross region abuse.

If both regions have differing owners/members it would be a severe bug.

WGPFix does not check parental relations or priorities explicitely, just straight comparison of the owners and members of the regions that WorldGuard returns for a certain position (not sure that involves parent egions).

What CraftBukkit version are you using ?

@ghost ghost assigned asofold Aug 3, 2012
@VADemon
Copy link
Author

VADemon commented Aug 3, 2012

Hm okay. Region 'city' doesn't have any members/owners, but I will add them if it helps.
One of 1.2.5 versions, will tell you later that day which one it is. (probably RB 1.0 ;)

@VADemon
Copy link
Author

VADemon commented Aug 3, 2012

Read the last part of his comment once again

@asofold
Copy link
Owner

asofold commented Aug 3, 2012

I will consider making the unowned regions thingy configurable and to prevent it, it should be possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants