Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arquillian, CDI 2.0 and JUnit 5/Jupiter #233

Closed
otaviojava opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Arquillian, CDI 2.0 and JUnit 5/Jupiter #233

otaviojava opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@otaviojava
Copy link

Hello, I put the question in the StackOverflow and body answer it.
I guess the answer is no.
With CDI 2.0 we can improve that integration in several ways.
I would like to make it happens.

What do you think?
If that makes sense, where is the right project to put CDI and Jupiter extension?

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60063537/arquillian-cdi-2-0-and-junit-5-jupiter

@bartoszmajsak
Copy link
Member

Hi @otaviojava, there's been great groundwork done by @zforgo - see #137 (comment)

Do you think you could collaborate on that? I would be thrilled to see that happening. And also I can help to move this forward.

@hantsy
Copy link
Member

hantsy commented Dec 2, 2022

This issue should be fixed.

@hantsy
Copy link
Member

hantsy commented Dec 2, 2022

I have created a starter template project to demo config for Glassfish, Payara, WildFLy, OpenLiberty, and Apache TomEE, it used Arquillian 1.7.0.x and JUnit 5.

see: https://github.com/hantsy/jakartaee9-starter-boilerplate

@starksm64
Copy link
Member

Let's open more specific issues on the current Junit 5 and CDI support as this does seem addressed at this point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants