Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ark_std::error vs core::error #44

Open
burdges opened this issue Apr 2, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

ark_std::error vs core::error #44

burdges opened this issue Apr 2, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@burdges
Copy link

burdges commented Apr 2, 2023

ark_std::error replaces core::error when not using std, but it winds up woefully inferior to the core::error behind #[feature(error_in_core)]. In particular ark_std::error::Error should've the downcast* methods on core::error::Error.

We should probably copy core::error to ark_std::error. Ain't much relevant in the real std::error anymore. If possible, we should detect #[feature(error_in_core)] or even nightly, so as to not replace core::error then.

Interestingly, there were never std::io references in std::error per se. It appears backtrace messed up moving std::error to core::error, but I've no idea why backtrace cannot work with just alloc, or be placed into an extension trait, or whatever.

@burdges
Copy link
Author

burdges commented Apr 13, 2023

@Pratyush
Copy link
Member

100% agree that we should switch to core::error, but as things stand this is not actionable, right? We need error_in_core to be stabilized first. I would prefer to avoid rust version detection, as that would involve a build.rs which worsens compile time.

@burdges
Copy link
Author

burdges commented Apr 13, 2023

I simply meant copy "more of" std::error from std into ark-std, specifically the <dyn Error>::downcast part.

I'll make @achimcc submit a PR for it if our auditors think error passing matters in ark-scale link above. We've correct error passing in the substrate host already, which maybe enough.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants