You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue seems like a continuation of #3031 where merges conflict if descriptions differ.
We use graphql-codegen that uses graphql-tools/merge to combine schema. Schemas are generated by two tools: graphql-js and graphql-java. Both generate a directive that differs slightly in the description.
/**
* The "specifiedBy" directive allows to provide a specification URL for a Scalar
*/
public static final GraphQLDirective SpecifiedByDirective = GraphQLDirective.newDirective()
.name(SPECIFIED_BY)
.description("Exposes a URL that specifies the behaviour of this scalar.")
.argument(newArgument()
.name("url")
.type(nonNull(GraphQLString))
.description("The URL that specifies the behaviour of this scalar."))
.validLocations(SCALAR)
.definition(SPECIFIED_BY_DIRECTIVE_DEFINITION)
.build();
The node parameter of the function validateInputs() in directives.ts looks like:
The fix for issue 3031 does not handle the argument description.
Print out of "printedNode" and "existing PrintedNode" of validateInputs():
The "sameArguments " comparision fail due to the spelling difference of "behaviour".
Expected behavior
When I tweaked the the validateInputs() function locally to ignore the argument description, the graphql-codegen tool seemed to work properly.
This issue seems like a continuation of #3031 where merges conflict if descriptions differ.
We use graphql-codegen that uses graphql-tools/merge to combine schema. Schemas are generated by two tools: graphql-js and graphql-java. Both generate a directive that differs slightly in the description.
Example of the directive: graphql-java/Directives.java at master · graphql-java/graphql-java · GitHub
The node parameter of the function validateInputs() in directives.ts looks like:
The fix for issue 3031 does not handle the argument description.
Print out of "printedNode" and "existing PrintedNode" of validateInputs():
The "sameArguments " comparision fail due to the spelling difference of "behaviour".
Expected behavior
When I tweaked the the validateInputs() function locally to ignore the argument description, the graphql-codegen tool seemed to work properly.
Environment:
@graphql-tools/[email protected]
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: