[GRPC] Is there a way to "flatten" the input arguments when using grpc source? #5686
Unanswered
nickaguilarh
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I'm experiencing a similar issue mentioned here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
You can add a new field within additionalTypeDefs and point it to the existing field. Other than that, there is no "flattening" transform. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
So, rigth now I have the following:
I'm looking for a way (I don't know if it is possible) to "remove" the "input" argument and just leave the "username" argument.
Something like this:
I'm thinking about expanding the scheme and replace but would be kind of repetitive. I also understand that this is to send the correct type to the remote GRPC server but could be it like a hidded "_input" argument? Just throwing some random ideas here.
PS: Hope this is a good place for this question, I wasn't sure if i had to publish it on issues or not.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions