We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Compile times seem to kind of blow up with too many generic impls, and it's not always worth the convenience.
Wrapper<Type>
TypeWrapper
Wrapper
data
IntWrapper
i32
i16
i8
u16
u8
StringWrapper
String
Box<str>
Cow<str>
&str
char
Type
base
Not all of this necessarily relates to performance, but in general the idea is to be a bit more conservative for the sake of simplicity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Compile times seem to kind of blow up with too many generic impls, and it's not always worth the convenience.
Wrapper<Type>
type to replace anyTypeWrapper
structsWrapper
structs always name their single fielddata
TypeWrapper
rather than using complicated blanket impls.IntWrapper
:i32
i16
i8
u16
u8
StringWrapper
:String
Box<str>
Cow<str>
&str
char
Type
assuming a generic wrapper structbase
plus optional fieldsbase
and nothing elseNot all of this necessarily relates to performance, but in general the idea is to be a bit more conservative for the sake of simplicity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: