You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the OPGEE_3.0c for CO2-EOR, the fraction of gas breakthrough in Primary Inputs is changed to Fraction of CO2 breaking through to producer whereas in the results the same input is labelled as Percentage of newly acquired CO2 (includes both new and recycled) which is basically = 1- fraction of CO2 breakthrough.
Can we please confirm for recent change made in the primary inputs to be labelled correctly in the results tab as well.
Also in my opinion to be more specific to industry terminology, if we can labelled the primary input as "net utilization factor" which is fresh CO2 / incremental bbl of oil. Also if we make this change, this would also make in line with the other dynamic inputs in OPGEE which are also normalized to functional unit (bbl oil) for eg. _GOR, WOR, WIR, and GFIR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the OPGEE_3.0c for CO2-EOR, the fraction of gas breakthrough in Primary Inputs is changed to Fraction of CO2 breaking through to producer whereas in the results the same input is labelled as Percentage of newly acquired CO2 (includes both new and recycled) which is basically = 1- fraction of CO2 breakthrough.
Can we please confirm for recent change made in the primary inputs to be labelled correctly in the results tab as well.
Also in my opinion to be more specific to industry terminology, if we can labelled the primary input as "net utilization factor" which is fresh CO2 / incremental bbl of oil. Also if we make this change, this would also make in line with the other dynamic inputs in OPGEE which are also normalized to functional unit (bbl oil) for eg. _GOR, WOR, WIR, and GFIR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: