-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deployment Failed to Start in different Namespace other than Default #223
Comments
hi @gopigrip7
|
Under |
Thanks @ewoutp. I reverted back to old creation templates without the operator. But Still feel, the operator is the right way to do. What you do think of the time line for this feature? |
We're very close to merge PR #238 which adds the option to install the operator as a helm chart. That will be the preferred way to install the operator and (by nature of helm) make it really easy to install in a different namespace. |
Helm is now available and the preferred solution for deploying in non-default namespaces. |
Hi Team, I was trying to use the operator for prod, yes left with no choice. I was trying to setup a arangodb operator in operator Namespace and try to create deployment in the different namespace with below cluster role & binding.
When I create the deployment in operator namespace, the cluster starts but when trying to do in a different namespace, nothing happens.
Please point out any bug in my cluster definition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: