-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-44872][CONNECT][FOLLOWUP] Deflake ReattachableExecuteSuite and increase retry buffer #42908
Closed
juliuszsompolski
wants to merge
3
commits into
apache:master
from
juliuszsompolski:SPARK-44872-followup
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.test.SharedSparkSession | |
* Base class and utilities for a test suite that starts and tests the real SparkConnectService | ||
* with a real SparkConnectClient, communicating over RPC, but both in-process. | ||
*/ | ||
class SparkConnectServerTest extends SharedSparkSession { | ||
trait SparkConnectServerTest extends SharedSparkSession { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. having it as a class was making it execute as a suite with no tests, but still doing the beforeAll / afterAll. |
||
|
||
// Server port | ||
val serverPort: Int = | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the purpose is to
Deflake ReattachableExecuteSuite and increase retry buffer
, shall we increase this only atReattachableExecuteSuite
instead of touching the default value?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I explained in the PR description that I think that increasing this default is a genuine improvement that will help make reconnects more robust in case of actual network issues, while not increasing memory pressure in a normal scenario (where the client controls the flow with ReleaseExecute)
Since Spark 3.5 released before that suite was added, making this change now is low risk change at this point before the next release, and it will have good baking-in time before next release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would rather not be changing it in the suite, because that suite is suppose to stress test how the actual client behaves when faced with disconnects. If we changed it in the suite, that would be sweeping under the carpet that I think from the experiments performed now that it was a bit too small for retries robustness.
This is not a major issue, and this in practice only applies in situations when connect faces real intermittent connectivity issues, where before this was implemented, it would just fail.