Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix](multi-table-load) fix be core when multi table load pipe finish fail #37383

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 7, 2024

Conversation

sollhui
Copy link
Contributor

@sollhui sollhui commented Jul 7, 2024

pick #36269

… fail (#36269)

## Proposed changes

```
*** Current BE git commitID: 5a8ea30 ***
*** SIGSEGV address not mapped to object (@0x18) received by PID 3726857 (TID 3727585 OR 0x7f0129e83700) from PID 24; stack trace: ***
 0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421
 1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) [clone .part.0] in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
 2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
 3# 0x00007F01D9E87090 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 4# std::_Function_handler<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> (), std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::_Setter<doris::Status, doris::Status const&> >::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/ldb_toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/std_function.h:290
 5# std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::_M_do_set(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>*, bool*) at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/ldb_toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/future:593
 6# __pthread_once_slow at /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/nptl/pthread_once.c:118
 7# std::__future_base::_State_baseV2::_M_set_result(std::function<std::unique_ptr<std::__future_base::_Result_base, std::__future_base::_Result_base::_Deleter> ()>, bool) at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/ldb_toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/future:428
 8# doris::io::MultiTablePipe::_handle_consumer_finished() at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/doris/be/src/io/fs/multi_table_pipe.cpp:334
 9# doris::io::MultiTablePipe::exec_plans<doris::TPipelineFragmentParams>(doris::ExecEnv*, std::vector<doris::TPipelineFragmentParams, std::allocator<doris::TPipelineFragmentParams> >)::{lambda(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::Status*)#1}::operator()(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::Status*) const at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/doris/be/src/io/fs/multi_table_pipe.cpp:253
10# doris::pipeline::PipelineFragmentContext::~PipelineFragmentContext() at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/doris/be/src/pipeline/pipeline_fragment_context.cpp:131
11# std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release_last_use_cold() at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/ldb_toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/../../../../include/c++/13/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:199
12# doris::pipeline::_close_task(doris::pipeline::PipelineTask*, doris::Status) at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/doris/be/src/pipeline/task_scheduler.cpp:95
13# doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work(unsigned long) at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/doris/be/src/pipeline/task_scheduler.cpp:168
14# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() in /mnt/hdd01/STRESS_ENV/be/lib/doris_be
15# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at /mnt/disk2/xujianxu/doris/be/src/util/thread.cpp:499
16# start_thread at /build/glibc-SzIz7B/glibc-2.31/nptl/pthread_create.c:478
17# __clone at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:97 
```

BE will core when multi table load pipe finish fail. For exec_task will
return if finish fail, causing ctx was deconstructed.
Wait all table finish to solve this problem.
@sollhui
Copy link
Contributor Author

sollhui commented Jul 7, 2024

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ void RoutineLoadTaskExecutor::exec_task(std::shared_ptr<StreamLoadContext> ctx,
}
// need memory order
multi_table_pipe->handle_consume_finished();
HANDLE_ERROR(kafka_pipe->finish(), "finish multi table task failed");
HANDLE_MULTI_TABLE_ERROR(kafka_pipe->finish(), "finish multi table task failed");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

warning: boolean expression can be simplified by DeMorgan's theorem [readability-simplify-boolean-expr]

        HANDLE_MULTI_TABLE_ERROR(kafka_pipe->finish(), "finish multi table task failed");
        ^
Additional context

be/src/runtime/routine_load/routine_load_task_executor.cpp:322: expanded from macro 'HANDLE_MULTI_TABLE_ERROR'

        if (UNLIKELY(!_status_.ok() && !_status_.is<PUBLISH_TIMEOUT>())) { \
            ^

be/src/common/compiler_util.h:35: expanded from macro 'UNLIKELY'

#define UNLIKELY(expr) __builtin_expect(!!(expr), 0)
                                         ^

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.33% (9151/25192)
Line Coverage: 27.87% (74691/268044)
Region Coverage: 26.76% (38519/143945)
Branch Coverage: 23.45% (19520/83242)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/35fd5df8bc0294ea27a63b629dd7432b1c44f950_35fd5df8bc0294ea27a63b629dd7432b1c44f950/report/index.html

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit f269315 into apache:branch-2.1 Jul 7, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants