Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Epic] Type-coercion improvements #2355

Closed
15 of 16 tasks
andygrove opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
15 of 16 tasks

[Epic] Type-coercion improvements #2355

andygrove opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@andygrove
Copy link
Member

andygrove commented Apr 27, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
I am running into type-coercion errors and am probably going to be adding more hacks to the existing implementation but would like to start tracking the work we need to do to improve the type-coercion logic as well as the various open issues that are related to type-coercion.

Examples of issues:

@Dandandan
Copy link
Contributor

I added #3431 to the list.

@alamb alamb changed the title [EPIC] Type-coercion improvements [Epic] Type-coercion improvements Mar 5, 2023
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Jun 11, 2023

The list is complete!

@alamb alamb closed this as completed Jun 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants