Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report Lineage metrics for SpannerIO #32561

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Report Lineage metrics for SpannerIO #32561

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

Abacn
Copy link
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn commented Sep 25, 2024

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@@ -246,9 +249,21 @@ private static SpannerAccessor createAndConnect(SpannerConfig spannerConfig) {
BatchClient batchClient =
spanner.getBatchClient(DatabaseId.of(options.getProjectId(), instanceId, databaseId));
DatabaseAdminClient databaseAdminClient = spanner.getDatabaseAdminClient();
String instanceConfigId = "unknown";
try {
instanceConfigId =
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per doc spanner FQN has format spanner:{projectId}.{instanceConfigId}.{instanceId}.{databaseId}.{assetId}

However, currently instanceConfigId is not mentioned throughout SpannerIO. Had to make a real API call to get instance config Id.

Because spannerAccessor is stored in a static concurrent Map, this call will be done per (Dataflow worker) * (spanner instance destination)

cc: @manitgupta would like to learn if there a better way to do this.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you know what is the avg and upper bound on "spanner instance destination" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is upper bounded by the number of SpannerIO (source+sink) used in the pipeline. (One SpannerIO transform only support single instance and database)

@Abacn Abacn marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 01:17
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Abacn commented Sep 26, 2024

assign set of reviewers

Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @robertwb for label java.
R: @chamikaramj for label io.
R: @nielm for label spanner.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Copy link
Contributor

@nielm nielm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Abacn Abacn merged commit 415fdd3 into apache:master Oct 2, 2024
27 checks passed
@Abacn Abacn deleted the lineagerdb branch October 2, 2024 02:14
reeba212 pushed a commit to reeba212/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants