-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Report Lineage metrics for SpannerIO #32561
Conversation
@@ -246,9 +249,21 @@ private static SpannerAccessor createAndConnect(SpannerConfig spannerConfig) { | |||
BatchClient batchClient = | |||
spanner.getBatchClient(DatabaseId.of(options.getProjectId(), instanceId, databaseId)); | |||
DatabaseAdminClient databaseAdminClient = spanner.getDatabaseAdminClient(); | |||
String instanceConfigId = "unknown"; | |||
try { | |||
instanceConfigId = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per doc spanner FQN has format spanner:{projectId}.{instanceConfigId}.{instanceId}.{databaseId}.{assetId}
However, currently instanceConfigId is not mentioned throughout SpannerIO. Had to make a real API call to get instance config Id.
Because spannerAccessor is stored in a static concurrent Map, this call will be done per (Dataflow worker) * (spanner instance destination)
cc: @manitgupta would like to learn if there a better way to do this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you know what is the avg and upper bound on "spanner instance destination" ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it is upper bounded by the number of SpannerIO (source+sink) used in the pipeline. (One SpannerIO transform only support single instance and database)
Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment |
assign set of reviewers |
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @robertwb for label java. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Please add a meaningful description for your change here
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.