refactor: annotate pymapdl part 1

[germa89]

Description

Annotate some files

Issue linked

Related to #3480

Checklist

• I have visited and read Develop PyMAPDL.
• I have tested my changes locally
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the PyMAPDL coding style guidelines.
• I have added appropriate unit tests that also ensure the minimal coverage criteria.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have marked this PR as draft if it is not ready to be reviewed yet.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Commit naming conventions (e.g. feat: adding new MAPDL command)

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[germa89]

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Okay, I will trigger a review of your PR.

[clatapie]

LGTM!

[germa89]

Okay, I will trigger a review of your PR.

... so?

@RobPasMue

[RobPasMue]

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.30070% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.15%. Comparing base (afad43e) to head (9008021).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3569      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.97%   87.15%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       14623    14627       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        12719    12748      +29     
+ Misses       1904     1879      -25     

[germa89]

@RobPasMue any news about the bot?

[germa89]

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Okay, I will trigger a review of your PR.

[RobPasMue]

@RobPasMue any news about the bot?

Nope - too many parallel tracks currently

[germa89]

@RobPasMue any news about the bot?

Nope - too many parallel tracks currently

Roger that... you tell me... this PR is no priority and if you think it is a good test for the bot (since it is just annotating... no other logic)... I can keep it open... or go ahead... up to you.

[RobPasMue]

Go ahead... don't wait for me. Sorry @germa89

[germa89]

Go ahead... don't wait for me. Sorry @germa89

No big deal at all! :)