Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
Pinging @PProfizi @akaszynski @rlagha @koubaa @cbellot000 for visibility. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
DPF has a concept of an abstract mesh, which can handle different mesh providers. abstract mesh -> vtk would be generally useful, perhaps as a dpf operator |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all,
It seems that capability of convert ANSYS mesh to VTK is important in DPF and PyMAPDL libraries.
These two libraries seem to use similar code:
Surely, the code is not entirely the same, but I think we could reuse most of them in both libraries. In fact, some future libraries might reuse it too.
Therefore, I would propose to externalize this capability to a different library (something like
ansys.helpers.vtk_export
?).This will help inhttps://github.com/ansys/pymapdl/pull/1299
Notes
I'm keeping the question and answers simple, but I'm open to heard other options/alternatives.
2 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions