You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a follow-up of the PyAnsys meeting, it was recommended to provide Vale as optional such that:
We should ask the user if they want to implement vale in CI/CD
Otherwise, it will be set up as an optional workflow
vale should be implemented so that the docs teams can run it, but if users don't want it to be part of their main CI/CD workflow, we should also allow it. This would be the perfect balance since the docs team will be able to run vale whenever they need, and it will not harass the developers in every PR.
📝 Description of the feature
As a follow-up of the PyAnsys meeting, it was recommended to provide Vale as optional such that:
vale
in CI/CDvale
should be implemented so that the docs teams can run it, but if users don't want it to be part of their main CI/CD workflow, we should also allow it. This would be the perfect balance since the docs team will be able to run vale whenever they need, and it will not harass the developers in every PR.💡 Steps for implementing the feature
Depending on the user's answer:
🔗 Useful links and references
Ask @RobPasMue in case of doubts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: