Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible memory leak introduced in 5.10.47/5.10.48 #156

Open
kwirk opened this issue Jul 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Possible memory leak introduced in 5.10.47/5.10.48 #156

kwirk opened this issue Jul 24, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@kwirk
Copy link

kwirk commented Jul 24, 2021

After upgrading from 5.10.46 to 5.10.48, I had issues with oom-killer killing Kodi in about 20mins of starting to watch a video. The system then became unstable, with other processes being randomly killed, and a system reboot was required.

Also tested 5.10.50 and 5.10.52 which still have this issue.

Issue appears to be related to kmalloc-128 constantly growing in size:

$ sudo slaptop -s c
Active / Total Objects (% used)    : 266001 / 289256 (92.0%)
 Active / Total Slabs (% used)      : 13992 / 13992 (100.0%)
 Active / Total Caches (% used)     : 137 / 265 (51.7%)
 Active / Total Size (% used)       : 93490.38K / 103413.99K (90.4%)
 Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.17K / 0.36K / 16.00K

  OBJS ACTIVE  USE OBJ SIZE  SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME                   
 83628  83586  99%    0.38K   3987       21     31896K kmalloc-128
 15316  14367  93%    0.55K    547       28      8752K inode_cache
 30720  30691  99%    0.27K   1024       30      8192K ext4_groupinfo_4k
 31424  28348  90%    0.25K   1964       16      7856K kmalloc-64
 24975  17937  71%    0.29K    925       27      7400K dentry
 26192  26153  99%    0.24K   1637       16      6548K kernfs_node_cache
 11169  11152  99%    0.45K    657       17      5256K radix_tree_node
  3728   1177  31%    0.95K    233       16      3728K ext4_inode_cache
 11222  10974  97%    0.26K    362       31      2896K vm_area_struct
  1168   1127  96%    2.00K     73       16      2336K kmalloc-1k
  1872   1779  95%    1.00K    117       16      1872K kmalloc-512
   392    378  96%    3.94K     49        8      1568K task_struct

Noted high number of drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit:

$ sudo sort -rn /sys/kernel/slab/kmalloc-128/alloc_calls | head
  80462 drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit+0x21c/0x7bc [drm_kms_helper] age=3/84268/167031 pid=276-602 cpus=0-3
    153 drm_property_create+0xa0/0x190 [drm] age=167039/167040/167044 pid=276 cpus=1
     93 snd_info_create_entry+0x28/0xe0 [snd] age=167039/167148/167184 pid=244-276 cpus=1
     47 drm_mode_duplicate+0x20/0x4c [drm] age=167032/167032/167032 pid=276 cpus=1
     28 drm_universal_plane_init+0x118/0x604 [drm] age=167039/167039/167039 pid=276 cpus=1
     17 __ipv6_dev_mc_inc+0x154/0x3c4 [ipv6] age=165848/166512/167270 pid=1-594 cpus=0-3
     14 v3d_fence_create+0x28/0x9c [v3d] age=3768/64040/165436 pid=322-323 cpus=0-2
     11 devm_snd_soc_register_component+0x2c/0x80 [snd_soc_core] age=167040/167054/167107 pid=261-276 cpus=1-2
     10 snd_ctl_new+0x34/0x8c [snd] age=167039/167068/167182 pid=244-276 cpus=1
      9 __drmm_add_action_or_reset+0x14/0x30 [drm] age=167038/167047/167078 pid=271-276 cpus=1

I downgraded to 5.10.46 and this has resolved the issue:

$ sudo grep drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit /sys/kernel/slab/kmalloc-128/alloc_calls
      9 drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit+0x214/0x790 [drm_kms_helper] age=1/236240/305496 pid=113-590 cpus=0-3
      1 drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit+0x538/0x790 [drm_kms_helper] age=1 pid=590 cpus=1
      1 drm_atomic_helper_setup_commit+0x6f4/0x790 [drm_kms_helper] age=304206 pid=590 cpus=0

My post on Raspberry Pi fourms for more background: https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=316394

@kwirk kwirk changed the title Possilbe memory leak introduced in 5.10.47/5.10.48 Possible memory leak introduced in 5.10.47/5.10.48 Jul 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant