Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(testing): correctly import NgMatchers #10077

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2016
Merged

fix(testing): correctly import NgMatchers #10077

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2016

Conversation

jasonchoimtt
Copy link
Contributor

Some test cases incorrectly rely on the side effect of other test cases importing NgMatchers. This commit fixes this by making expect in core/testing_internal properly typed.

//cc @IgorMinar

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

No

@jasonchoimtt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@IgorMinar rebased to fix merge conflict

Some test cases incorrectly rely on the side effect of other test cases
importing `NgMatchers`. This commit fixes this by making `expect` in
`core/testing_internal` properly typed.
@vicb vicb merged commit 64fc464 into angular:master Jul 22, 2016
hbkrunal pushed a commit to hbkrunal/angular that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2016
Some test cases incorrectly rely on the side effect of other test cases
importing `NgMatchers`. This commit fixes this by making `expect` in
`core/testing_internal` properly typed.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants