Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve webpack build using happypack #6419

Closed
Toub opened this issue May 23, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Improve webpack build using happypack #6419

Toub opened this issue May 23, 2017 · 5 comments
Labels
feature Issue that requests a new feature P5 The team acknowledges the request but does not plan to address it, it remains open for discussion severity2: inconvenient

Comments

@Toub
Copy link

Toub commented May 23, 2017

Bug Report or Feature Request (mark with an x)

- [ ] bug report -> please search issues before submitting
- [x] feature request

Versions.

I am not using the very last version, but this is not relevant here.

@angular/cli: 1.0.0
node: 6.9.5
os: linux x64
@angular/animations: 4.1.0
@angular/common: 4.1.0
@angular/core: 4.1.0
@angular/forms: 4.1.0
@angular/http: 4.1.0
@angular/material: 2.0.0-beta.3
@angular/platform-browser: 4.1.0
@angular/platform-browser-dynamic: 4.1.0
@angular/router: 4.1.0
@angular/cli: 1.0.0
@angular/compiler: 4.1.0
@angular/compiler-cli: 4.1.0

Desired functionality.

Looks like happypack now deals well with typescript loaders.

What about using it to improve build time?

Mention any other details that might be useful.

@see amireh/happypack#33 (comment)

@Brocco Brocco added P5 The team acknowledges the request but does not plan to address it, it remains open for discussion severity2: inconvenient feature Issue that requests a new feature labels May 23, 2017
@johnnyreilly
Copy link

In case it's helpful we've put some docs in place: https://github.com/typestrong/ts-loader#happypackmode-boolean-defaultfalse

@johnnyreilly
Copy link

And it's now in the official happypack documentation as well: https://github.com/amireh/happypack#does-it-work-with-typescript

@hansl hansl removed their assignment Feb 6, 2018
@alan-agius4
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as this doesn't fall in our roadmap especially considering AOT compilation.

@kondi
Copy link

kondi commented Jan 7, 2019

:( We have more and more available threads, even in mainstream CPUs. Would be useful to benefit of parallelization in project build times. Also, especially useful for AOT compilation, because it takes more time.
Are there other plans for parallelization?

@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feature Issue that requests a new feature P5 The team acknowledges the request but does not plan to address it, it remains open for discussion severity2: inconvenient
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants