Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
28 lines (21 loc) · 2.39 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

28 lines (21 loc) · 2.39 KB
Raw

TicTacToe.sol

An Ethereum smart contract which manages Tic Tac Toe games. Users challenge one another to games for an amount of eth, and are awarded for winning.

Creating a game

  • A game is created when a wallet (the challenger) calls the create_game function a value of eth they would like to bet, as well as an address of their opponent and an amount of time in seconds until the game challenge is expired.
  • The challenger is returned an integer game_id of the created game.
  • The challenger will get the second turn in the game.

Accepting a challenge to a game

  • The opponent address (the challenged) can call the accept_challenge function with the game_id of the game created by their challenger, passing a value of eth >= the value sent by the challenger.
  • The challenged will be refunded any amount above the value sent by the challenger.
  • If this function succeeds, the game will be ready to be played.
  • If the challenged fails to call the accept_challenge function before the game is expired, the challenger will be able to call the cancel_challenge function to be refunded the eth they deposited.

Playing the game

  • Once a game is created by a challenger and then accepted by the challenged, each player alternates calling the play_a_turn function, starting with the challenged.
  • The play_a_turn function takes a game_id of the game to take a turn on, and a location integer 0-8 which corresponds to a board cell (see TicTacToe.sol).
  • When a game is won, the winner recieves the total amount of eth deposited for that game (double the amount they sent to create/accept the game -- their original amount as well as the amount sent by their opponent).
  • If a game is tied, both players are refunded they amount they sent.

See TicTacToe.sol for implementation, it is heavily commented the specifics.

Some issues:

  • It seems that there is a difference in gas cost for the challenger vs the challenged calling play_a_function (3123 gas for the challenged but only 3095 gas for the challenger). This might be due to player1's turn and player2's turns using different functions behind the hood, or something to do with how play_a_turn checks which players turn it is.
  • Testing could be a lot more exhaustive.
  • The implementation of the player boards could probably be changed to use one uint32 instead of two uint16s -- might solve the gas issue.