You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your great work.
In the paper you mentioned that you train for 300K/90K iterations with and without an adversarial loss, respectively, to achieve the results presented in Tables 1-3.
I assume that you first run the train.py script with --epochs 1000 and --lambda_gan 1.0. Then, you select the best model and run the same script again with --epochs 300 and --lambda_gan 0. The best model of the second run should achieve the presented results. Is that assumption correct, or did you use a different approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thank you for your great work.
In the paper you mentioned that you train for 300K/90K iterations with and without an adversarial loss, respectively, to achieve the results presented in Tables 1-3.
I assume that you first run the train.py script with --epochs 1000 and --lambda_gan 1.0. Then, you select the best model and run the same script again with --epochs 300 and --lambda_gan 0. The best model of the second run should achieve the presented results. Is that assumption correct, or did you use a different approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: