Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2021. It is now read-only.

Finer-grained transaction control #40

Open
clementd-fretlink opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Finer-grained transaction control #40

clementd-fretlink opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@clementd-fretlink
Copy link

The CLI tool wraps the whole migration sequence in a single transaction. When using the library, it's up to the user to decide whether or not to wrap the sequence in a transaction. So it's really an all-or-nothing choice: a single transaction, or none at all.

Some operations (like adding a variant to an enum type, for instance) require a commit before being usable, which prevent them from being present in a composite migration sequence (unless the whole sequence is run outside of a transaction).

From the CLI tool standpoint, I think having a simple way to choose the transaction strategy (no transaction, single transaction, per-file transaction) would be a great improvement.

From the lib standpoint this would imply having a way to optionally wrap each migration in a transaction.

@clementd-fretlink
Copy link
Author

clementd-fretlink commented Jul 29, 2021

I'd be glad to open a PR on this if that makes sense to other people

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant