Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modifies
DataModel
andLanguage
implementations for code generator #81Modifies
DataModel
andLanguage
implementations for code generator #81Changes from 2 commits
cc6a21c
6bd7644
948c8dd
ba59f35
d614692
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(🗺️ PR tour) Renames
DataModel
toAbstractDataType
. Also modifiesSequence
enum variant to store information about sequence data type. (#69)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These comments and the
Display
impl below include a lot of ISL-specific details. The ADT is the middle ground between ISL and a target language, so I think ideally it wouldn't know about or mention either.Which ADT variant would be used for a user-defined data type that looked like this?
If it's
Value
, then we shouldn't describe it as "scalar". If it'sStruct
, then it would be good to mention "user defined types" as a use case forStruct
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. This specific example would be struct but if we had a type definition like below:
with following POJO representation:
Then this would be
Value
. All the structs with a single field that represents the data type(e.g. integer) for that type definition(e.g.Id
) will be underValue
.