Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'max_depth' parameter should default as None, not 1 #5

Open
daniel347x opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

'max_depth' parameter should default as None, not 1 #5

daniel347x opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@daniel347x
Copy link

It was a hassle for me to get the behavior shown in the examples on the README. I was expecting to see inputs/output sizes for all of my layers, just as seen in the examples in the README. But that doesn't happen because max_depth must be set; otherwise the default of 1 results in just the top layer's inputs/outputs being shown.

Can I recommend that the default for max_depth be changed to None (so that 9999 is the result, from the current code) so that, out-of-the-box, users see all their info and they also see what is shown in the README appearing in their own output when they use the same parameters as shown in the README?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant