Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: rm deadcode in storage/volume #2027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2018

Conversation

allencloud
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Allen Sun [email protected]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

rm some deadcode detected by deadcode.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

none

Ⅲ. Describe how you did it

None

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

none

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

none

Signed-off-by: Allen Sun <[email protected]>
@allencloud allencloud changed the title refactor: rm deadcode refactor: rm deadcode in storage/volume Jul 31, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 31, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@cec4108). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2027   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   63.37%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      200           
  Lines             ?    15500           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     9823           
  Misses            ?     4436           
  Partials          ?     1241
Flag Coverage Δ
#criv1alpha1test 33.79% <ø> (?)
#criv1alpha2test 34.3% <ø> (?)
#integrationtest 38.49% <ø> (?)
#unittest 21.08% <ø> (?)
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
storage/volume/types/vars.go 0% <ø> (ø)
storage/volume/core_util.go 42.85% <ø> (ø)

@rudyfly
Copy link
Collaborator

rudyfly commented Aug 7, 2018

LGTM

@rudyfly rudyfly merged commit 708eca8 into AliyunContainerService:master Aug 7, 2018
@pouchrobot pouchrobot added the LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. label Aug 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
areas/storage kind/refactor LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants