Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding ability to build libressl instead #21

Open
ZoeyR opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Consider adding ability to build libressl instead #21

ZoeyR opened this issue Feb 14, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@ZoeyR
Copy link

ZoeyR commented Feb 14, 2019

Currently this crate only supports downloading and building the openssl source. It might be useful for upstream projects (like openssl-sys) if this crate could be set to build libressl instead.

@sfackler
Copy link
Collaborator

How would this be useful for upstream projects like openssl-sys?

@ZoeyR
Copy link
Author

ZoeyR commented Feb 14, 2019

openssl-sys supports dynamic linking to libressl and has a feature to instead use a bundled openssl. There is no way to use the bundled feature to bundle in libressl.

@sfackler
Copy link
Collaborator

The point of the vendored feature is to "just make it work in a portable way". If someone cares enough about the library choice to explicitly want libressl, it seems like they can built it themselves.

@BusyJay
Copy link
Contributor

BusyJay commented Jul 4, 2019

I write a crate that provides libressl sources for openssl: https://github.com/BusyJay/libressl-src. Currently it can be integrated into openssl-sys by the replace or patch configuration of cargo.

I also feel OK to merge the project into openssl-src if there is a way to do it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants