Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSFS - airways not used when creating a flight plan #1001

Closed
ChrisXPP opened this issue Feb 26, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

MSFS - airways not used when creating a flight plan #1001

ChrisXPP opened this issue Feb 26, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ChrisXPP
Copy link

Hi!

When I try to create a flight plan with (low) airways for MSFS (version 1.30.12) with stock nav data (i. e. Navblue only, option "do not use Navigraph database" is ticked) the route doesn't include any airways, just direct legs between the enroute waypoints:

route_calculation

route_w_o_navigraph

As soon as I tick the option to use the Navigraph database for airways and procedures the parsed route looks like this:

route_w_navigraph

As a crosscheck I tried the same with the XP12 database, and here in both cases the route includes airways.

@albar965
Copy link
Owner

Thanks. I have to check what's going on there. Seems that not all airways are affected.
The FSX, P3D and MSFS airway data is a bit messy and I had to create a few workarounds to get this into a usable structure.

@albar965 albar965 self-assigned this Feb 26, 2023
@albar965 albar965 added the bug label Feb 26, 2023
@albar965 albar965 added this to the Release 2.8.9 milestone Feb 26, 2023
@albar965
Copy link
Owner

Do you have the Navigraph navdata update installed in MSFS by any chance?

@ChrisXPP
Copy link
Author

No, just stock nav data (Navblue) which was updated last week on 23rd February.

@albar965
Copy link
Owner

Ok. Thanks.

@albar965
Copy link
Owner

Fixed with albar965/atools@d29060e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants