Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support mqtt to kafka proxy using asyncapi.yaml #741

Closed
jfallows opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #818
Closed

Support mqtt to kafka proxy using asyncapi.yaml #741

jfallows opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #818
Assignees
Labels
story Feature description from user's perspective

Comments

@jfallows
Copy link
Contributor

jfallows commented Jan 16, 2024

Describe the desired outcome from the user's perspective
As an AsyncAPI consumer, I want to configure zilla as mqtt proxy to kafka using asyncapi.yaml more directly in zilla.yaml.

Acceptance criteria

  • asyncapi server binding configured via mqtt asyncapi.yaml
  • asyncapi client binding configured via kafka asyncapi.yaml
  • asyncapi proxy binding configured via mqtt and kafka asyncapi.yaml
  • only asyncapi server, proxy and client bindings needed to configure mqtt to kafka proxy

Additional context
Syntax similar to the following in zilla.yaml using composite bindings.

bindings:
  asyncapi_server:
    type: asyncapi
    kind: server
    options:
      specs:
        - mqtt/asyncapi.yaml
    exit: asyncapi_proxy
  asyncapi_proxy:
    type: asyncapi
    kind: proxy
    options:
      specs:
        - mqtt/asyncapi.yaml
        - kafka/asyncapi.yaml
    routes:
      - when:
           - operation: ... # mqtt asyncapi operation id
         exit: asyncapi_client
         with:
           operation: ... # kafka asyncapi operation id
  asyncapi_client:
    type: asyncapi
    kind: client
    options:
      specs:
        - kafka/asyncapi.yaml
@jfallows jfallows added the story Feature description from user's perspective label Jan 16, 2024
@jfallows jfallows linked a pull request Feb 29, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
story Feature description from user's perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants