Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 0.9.0 #104

Closed
fafhrd91 opened this issue Jul 7, 2014 · 11 comments
Closed

Release 0.9.0 #104

fafhrd91 opened this issue Jul 7, 2014 · 11 comments
Labels

Comments

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member

fafhrd91 commented Jul 7, 2014

i think we need #97 before 0.9.0 release. Do we need anything else?

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

asvetlov commented Jul 7, 2014

No other showstoppers from my perspective (at least for now).

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member Author

fafhrd91 commented Jul 8, 2014

i'm going to release 0.9.0 tomorrow. objections?

@kxepal
Copy link
Member

kxepal commented Jul 8, 2014

Tomorrow is good. It gives me the time to make another PR with bug fix (:

@popravich
Copy link
Member

Just to be clear, which "tomorrow" you mean (utc time please)? :)
What's your time/timezone?
(because I see you've already marked 0.9.0 release in CHANGES.txt)

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member Author

fafhrd91 commented Jul 8, 2014

i'm in PST time. if you need more time let's move release to other date.

@popravich
Copy link
Member

No, I'm ok with release.
just wanted to sync time)

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member Author

fafhrd91 commented Jul 8, 2014

Thank you everyone for help with release! i think we are very close to 1.0

@fafhrd91 fafhrd91 closed this as completed Jul 8, 2014
@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

asvetlov commented Jul 8, 2014

I think not so close -- client API looks good enough but server part is not.

@fafhrd91
Copy link
Member Author

fafhrd91 commented Jul 8, 2014

i think low-level part looks good. high level api will require a lot of work.

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

asvetlov commented Jul 8, 2014

@fafhrd91 agree

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 29, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been
any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for
related bugs.

If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion,
please include those exceprts into that new issue.

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Oct 29, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants