Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raspberry pi 5 boot problems vc4 graphics and networking #1383

Open
davidlekve opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Raspberry pi 5 boot problems vc4 graphics and networking #1383

davidlekve opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@davidlekve
Copy link

davidlekve commented Oct 29, 2024

Description

The raspberry pi 5 does not boot properly when having enabled vc4graphics in combination with some meta-openembedded/meta-networking.

I have not had a succesfull boot with image-core-full-cmdline without removing vc4graphics. I have not had a successful boot with image-core-base and meta-openemvedded/meta-networking added as bblayer.

This seems to be related to other issues issue #1079 and therefore maybe being a problem with the 64-based machines.

Steps to reproduce the issue:

  1. Build core-image-base for rpi5 and have successful boot
  2. Run bitbake-layers add-layer /path/to/meta-openembedded/meta-networking (and therefore also add meta-python)
    3.Boot now stops when loading vc4graphics:
    image

Describe the results you received:
Not successful boot

Describe the results you expected:
successful boot

Additional information you deem important (e.g. issue happens only occasionally):

Additional details (revisions used, host distro, etc.):
Using the scarthgap branch.
I have mostly tested in combination with kas from meta-mender-community

@davidlekve
Copy link
Author

I have noticed that deleting the boot partition and then reflashing the sd-card (I use dd) often fixes this issue. I have still not made it work with core-image-full-cmdline

@Woojin-Crive
Copy link

I am currently facing the same issue described here. I was wondering if there has been any progress or updates on this matter? Any information or workaround would be greatly appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants