We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SparseConnectivityTracer.jl/src/tracers.jl
Lines 119 to 121 in 83cb0b0
Would it be more coherent to have keys of type eltype(S), since they are also indices, rather than always UInt64?
eltype(S)
UInt64
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sounds good. :)
Sorry, something went wrong.
As seen in #45, we should also
AbstractDict
SortedDict
SortedVector
T
I
eltype(S) == I
HessianTracer
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
SparseConnectivityTracer.jl/src/tracers.jl
Lines 119 to 121 in 83cb0b0
Would it be more coherent to have keys of type
eltype(S)
, since they are also indices, rather than alwaysUInt64
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: