Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pass expression options to ResourceLoader #187

Conversation

panec
Copy link
Contributor

@panec panec commented Jun 4, 2020

Description

Updated logic to allow passing expression options to custom Resource Loader

Related Issue

#186

Motivation and Context

Allow custom implementation to handle options passed to loader.

How Has This Been Tested?

I run all the existing test and all are green. This functionality does not change any of the compiled HTML.
I do not know if there are any test for that logic. If there is please point me to it so I can add the test.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@tripodsan tripodsan merged commit 92e9ae4 into adobe:master Jun 5, 2020
adobe-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2020
# [4.5.0](v4.4.1...v4.5.0) (2020-06-05)

### Features

* **runtime:** pass expression options to resource loader ([92e9ae4](92e9ae4)), closes [#186](#186) [#187](#187)
@adobe-bot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.5.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants