Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UX feedback #81

Open
1 of 10 tasks
dabreegster opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 10 tasks

UX feedback #81

dabreegster opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dabreegster
Copy link
Collaborator

dabreegster commented Aug 6, 2024

We had a few UX studies and have already resolved many of the things that came up, but here's my list of remaining problems.

Easier:

  • Selecting authority should auto-fill combined authority and region
  • In the street placemaking check, the previous/next question links at the bottom aren't easily visible, because the left navbar is very long
  • Funding programme maybe needs to be a checkbox and have an "other" case (maybe already resolved with the custom text box?)
  • For georeferencing, many things needed. (Rotation, handling PDF input with multiple images, saving)
  • Policy check summary text could be copied from critical issue text

Harder:

  • Consider preset text options for critical summaries
  • Need a QC mode. Two new text boxes for each metric question, one set for the summary page.
  • Need a presentation/sharing mode. In PMP, a way to flip through problems and filter for resolved/not.
  • Figure out how to handle multiple criticals in exactly the same point
  • Consider making the overview page show the status of each step (letting the user manually mark some things as done)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant