We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There seem to be too many "requires-review" as a first glance in the summary report from a d2d project for ELF.
https://github.com/aboutcode-org/back2source-data/blob/main/data/archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/40/Everything/x86_64/debug/tree/a/atomix-debugsource-44.0-4.fc40.x86_64/d2d-summary.json#L36 has only one requires review
https://github.com/aboutcode-org/back2source-data/blob/main/data/archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/40/Everything/x86_64/debug/tree/a/atomix-debugsource-44.0-4.fc40.x86_64/d2d-details.json#L3535 has many correctly mapped paths that are marked as requires-review likely incorrectly
Also we should not include directories and <artificial> and <built-in> (and this may something we could filter out in the elf-inspector ?)
<artificial>
<built-in>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a duplicate of #1403
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There seem to be too many "requires-review" as a first glance in the summary report from a d2d project for ELF.
https://github.com/aboutcode-org/back2source-data/blob/main/data/archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/40/Everything/x86_64/debug/tree/a/atomix-debugsource-44.0-4.fc40.x86_64/d2d-summary.json#L36 has only one requires review
https://github.com/aboutcode-org/back2source-data/blob/main/data/archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/40/Everything/x86_64/debug/tree/a/atomix-debugsource-44.0-4.fc40.x86_64/d2d-details.json#L3535 has many correctly mapped paths that are marked as requires-review likely incorrectly
Also we should not include directories and
<artificial>
and<built-in>
(and this may something we could filter out in the elf-inspector ?)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: