You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In addition to a u-url class on the <a href> tags, I had dates like this: <span class="updateddate dt-published">Updated October 3, 2024</span> This obviously wasn't parsed at all, so the date wasn't displayed in the feed output. But because it found the dt-published class, it didn't include the u-url line.
My suggestion would be that the u-url line is displayed if the dt-published date isn't parsed correctly and therefore isn't shown, not if it simply sees something with a dt-published class.
As a matter of personal preference, I feel that if the URL isn't explicitly shown in the feed output, it should by the title that links to the article, not the date, anyway. I assume there's a reason it's being done the way it is, but that's my 2¢ as someone new to this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In addition to a
u-url
class on the<a href>
tags, I had dates like this:<span class="updateddate dt-published">Updated October 3, 2024</span>
This obviously wasn't parsed at all, so the date wasn't displayed in the feed output. But because it found thedt-published class
, it didn't include the u-url line.My suggestion would be that the u-url line is displayed if the dt-published date isn't parsed correctly and therefore isn't shown, not if it simply sees something with a dt-published class.
As a matter of personal preference, I feel that if the URL isn't explicitly shown in the feed output, it should by the title that links to the article, not the date, anyway. I assume there's a reason it's being done the way it is, but that's my 2¢ as someone new to this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: